What might wisdom-bound organizations look like?

According to this framework, a wisdom-bound organization would need to cover the following features:  

Humility.

A practice of not-knowing and acknowledgement of own limitations.
Think of an old tree nourishing all organisms growing on it. 

Appreciates all forms of knowing, being and learning

Think of the multitude of ways in which trees “take in” information and nutrients via air, sun, roots, leaves, bark. 

  • Puts practices in place to support multi-sensory (propositional, procedural, perspectival, and participatory) and relational learning. 
  • Emphasis on literacy in those practices to use them well and seamlessly.
  • Often collective (not solitary) practices or learning from each other. 

Deeply connected with its ecosystem, almost indistinguishable from it.

Think of a river that “begins” with raindrops and “ends” in the ocean. 

  • A purpose bigger than itself. As close to “life itself” as possible. 
  • Intentional pathways for interconnection with several “outside” groups. 
  • Ready (and able) to be transformed and molded by its environment, in its parts and in major ways (an organizational “egolessness”).

Emphasis on meaningfulness

Think of a tapestry of different materials. 

  • Meaningfulness as a measure stick, both for individuals and the collective. 
  • Creating possibility by connecting what exists. Connecting what “wants to be together”. Like a river that carves its path through the landscape, not by force but by following the path of least resistance
  • A commitment to keep the context of people, objects, and information intact. 

Want to be involved?

If you would like to give comments or dig deeper into my content, please see options on how to co-travel with me.


Comments

One response to “What might wisdom-bound organizations look like?”

  1. rmattlagemaccom Avatar
    rmattlagemaccom

    Hey Ted – interesting new thoughts & metaphors!!

    Below I added some edits/suggestions in blue italic font

    Here are a few more substantive ones:

    Re: “This can be spiritual, or a VUCA-aware or complex systems mindset.” a. VUCA is a characterization of the symptoms, VUCA-aware I think might indicate encompass the variety of “literacies” needed to acknowledge and gesture towards adapting/reacting to a VUCA world b. VUCA includes complexity so “or complex systems” is redundant

    Re: “Like a river that carves its path through the landscape, not by force but by following the path of least resistance.”

    Some thoughts: the text is mixing metaphors ~ trees ~ tapestries ~ and now rivers – maybe keep trees? Re: trees and rivers ~ BOTH follow paths of least resistance AND use force to carve new pathways ~ so to with meaning creation ~ it not only creates new meaning but also becomes a new force/influence in the ecosystem

    Gotta go –

    ~ Rodger

    Like

Leave a comment